Acquisitions

M&A due diligence from evidence to acquisition decisions

M&A due diligence is the process of testing what you believe about a target business before you commit to the acquisition. Acquisitions gives buyers a controlled data room, AI red flags across financials and contracts, and report export. Organize the evidence, bring in the right advisors and turn unanswered questions into a review your investment team can assess.

Buyer reviewing a printed due diligence binder with handwritten notes at a library table

Start with the investment assumptions you need to test

A broad request list can generate an impressive archive while leaving the important questions unanswered. Begin with the assumptions behind the proposed purchase. You may depend on recurring customers, transferable contracts, a stable workforce or margins that survive a change of owner. Those assumptions determine where the review needs to go deepest.

Define the entities, assets and liabilities within scope with your advisors. Ask which records support each assumption and what evidence would change the investment case. Keep gaps explicit. If a target cannot provide a reconciliation or an executed agreement, the absence itself belongs in the discussion. The purpose of diligence is to understand uncertainty, rather than simply to complete a document collection exercise.

Give each area a clear question and owner

Financial diligence examines earnings, cash conversion and the balance sheet. Legal diligence examines ownership, contracts, disputes and transfer conditions. Commercial review tests customers, retention and the reasons people buy. Tax, HR and IT workstreams examine obligations and operational continuity that can affect price or the ability to run the business.

Use the due diligence checklist as a starting structure, then adapt it to the transaction. An asset purchase may require close attention to contract assignment. A business dependent on a specialized team may require a detailed retention and employment review. Assign responsibility for conclusions to qualified reviewers instead of assuming that everybody who can access a folder owns the issue.

  • State the assumption or exposure each workstream examines.
  • Request supporting evidence with the relevant entity and period.
  • Identify the advisor who evaluates an answer.
  • Record what remains open before the next transaction decision.

Keep documents organized and disclosure deliberate

Acquisitions provides a data room with permissions per folder and expiring links. Use financial, legal, commercial, tax, HR and IT folders to keep materials understandable. Separate drafts from signed agreements and forecasts from historical results. Ask the seller to explain missing documents and ambiguous reporting periods.

Invite external sellers, lawyers and accountants for view and upload only without requiring a paid seat for those activities. Internal reviewers use included seats. Team and Fund add watermarking and a view audit log. The virtual data room guide explains how to design access around review responsibilities. Confidentiality arrangements and appropriate handling practices remain part of the transaction process.

Use potential red flags to direct the next question

AI review highlights potential concerns in uploaded financials and contracts. A financial finding may prompt a reconciliation of revenue periods or an explanation of an unusual expense. A contract finding may prompt counsel to examine assignment, termination or renewal. Read the relevant material before deciding what the observation means.

Cross-workstream questions deserve particular attention. A customer contract may undermine a forecast assumption. A supplier agreement may explain a margin change. A lease may create a funding need after closing. Connect financial due diligence with AI contract review software rather than treating the reports as separate conclusions about the business.

Ask for the evidence that can resolve the issue

Team and Fund include Q&A and custom due diligence checklists. Use them to frame specific requests and review responses. Ask for the customer agreement and amendments, not merely confirmation that the relationship is secure. Ask for a reconciliation between the schedule and the accounts, not merely an explanation that the numbers are correct.

Have the relevant advisor decide whether the response addresses the question. Management context can be helpful without resolving an evidentiary gap. Some issues require an additional document, others require a specialist opinion or a negotiated protection. Distinguish these outcomes so the team does not mark a finding closed simply because somebody replies.

Convert findings into transaction responses

Diligence can lead to a revised assumption, a price discussion, a closing condition, a consent request or a decision to stop. The correct response depends on the materiality of the issue and the options available under the proposed deal. A risk label alone cannot determine that response.

Discuss findings with the advisors responsible for the relevant area. If a major customer can terminate, examine both the contract and the relationship. If an earnings adjustment lacks support, consider how the acquisition model changes without it. The team should understand whether a conclusion rests on documented evidence, an accepted assumption or an unresolved uncertainty before making the next commitment.

Export findings for an accountable review

Export the red flag report and use it with advisor reports and your investment memo. Identify the document coverage, missing materials and proposed next actions. A useful reporting package helps a decision maker follow the issue from evidence to implication, even if they do not read every file in the room.

Acquisitions supports the review and does not replace legal, accounting, tax or other professional advice. AI review can miss an issue or misread context, and the document set may be incomplete. Read the M&A due diligence process guide for a practical sequence from scope through findings and closing preparation.

Match the plan to the way your team reviews

Deal provides capacity for a focused acquisition room with document analyses and report export. Team adds more rooms and analyses, custom checklists, Q&A, watermarking and a view audit log. Fund expands capacity and adds SSO, a portfolio view and priority support. Pricing lists the exact allowances and charges.

Annual billing is the default, paid as a yearly total. Analyses count per billing period, and deleting documents does not restore usage. Consider both financial and contract review volume when choosing a plan. The due diligence software page helps compare a recurring review process with an ad hoc folder arrangement.

FAQ

No. Scope depends on the target, transaction structure and investment assumptions. Use qualified advisors to identify the areas that need deeper review.

No. It flags potential document issues. Your team and advisors assess the evidence, negotiate terms and make the acquisition decision.

The one-time demo provides a partial preview without an account. Create and confirm an account to see the full demo report. There is no free plan.

Begin with the document behind your next question

Analyze a document, inspect the findings and create your account for the acquisition review.

Analyze a document